Sun.Star Cebu <> Monday, February 25, 2008
BY NANCY R. CUDIS, Sun.Star Staff Reporter
IN THE midst of high-level corruption allegations in the government, one local volunteer-driven movement stood out for its awareness and responses.
Dilaab Foundation Inc. traces its roots to the year 2000, when a group of friends, while cleaning a room in the St. Jerome Bible Center in Mabolo, Cebu City, decided to start a newsletter for overseas Filipino workers (OFWs).
They called themselves Friends of Pedro, an advocacy outreach for OFWs and their families. That eventually paved the way for the creation of Kamatuoran (2001), which campaigns for a country free of “narcopolitics” or the influence of illegal drug money, and later, Barug Pilipino (2003), which works against graft and corruption.
“In a way, these three children gave birth to the mother, Dilaab, in February 2006. But these three groups still exist,” its overall coordinating steward, Fr. Carmelo Diola, told Sun.Star Cebu.
Dilaab means “conflagration” or “tongues of fire.” One of their aims is to ignite “spaces of hope.”
But Dilaab wants to do more than light candles in churches. Last week, it launched a signature campaign, celebrated two masses in search of the truth and in support of the whistleblowers, and collected around 5,000 signatures from one of the masses alone.
“If you look at the signature campaign, in a way, you spend less sweat than going to the streets. Each signature represents a potential hope that is a language that is easy to understand. Also, the one who signs doesn’t just belong to a nameless anonymous mass of people. The dignity is shown. The message is clear because it is written in the manifesto,” said Diola.
So far, the movement has refrained from joining the cries of other cause-oriented groups in the streets.
What are Dilaab’s reactions to the testimony of Rodolfo “Jun” Lozada Jr.?
Our official response is that we believe in the testimony as far it corroborates the testimonies of two other people. Then, we’ll take it from there. We don’t want to focus on or even glorify personalities. We want to focus on the issue, and the issue is really massive, systemic graft and corruption.
Why has Dilaab refrained from joining street protests so far?
First of all, I’d like to say that those who join street protests, if that is what their conscience is telling them, we have to respect that. But we have to learn from our lessons of People Power 1, People Power 2 and the impeachment of (former Chief Justice Hilario) Davide (Jr.). We certainly cannot be accused of not getting involved.
One lesson is that there is a new form of people power that is emerging. It’s still peaceful and should be within the Constitution. One component is a signature campaign. We also did this for the Sugbuak issue. It works. Just make sure you know who to give this to and that the mechanism is clear. It’s not as if we are not getting involved. We are but in a new way, which I think might be more effective.
What does Dilaab believe Filipinos, by now weary of corruption allegations, can learn from the situation?
The first lesson: we are all in this together as part of the problem and part of the solution, to the extent that we are actively involved in graft and corruption either as the one bribing or the one extorting.
We are also part of the problem because of our silence. You know, the sin we are talking about is sloth, and apathy can be a manifestation of sloth. We can also be part of the solution. Being part of the solution means change in the mindset. Unless we have a clear program on how to deal with graft and corruption, there will only be sound and fury, signifying nothing. Bagsak.
What happens? We go back. Our effort must be purposeful. All these tell me that there are two elements we should follow. One is a paradigm shift in the way we think as a people. This refers to the cultural shift called heroic Christian citizenship. To be a good Christian, one must also strive to be a good citizen. If we jump to organizing big mass actions, nobody will get involved. With heroic Christian citizenship, we hope to form the critical mass necessary for social transformation.
The second part is, we need to organize ourselves. Without a support group, our journey towards integrity is difficult. We need to form support groups that are church-based and are linked with other sectors so that good people in government and in other sectors will be supported in their journey towards integrity and good governance.
Without support groups, yesterday’s heroes will be today’s tyrants. Without these groups and change in mentality, we will become the very monsters we set out to slay. If people now choose to stand up and whistle-blow, that’s still good citizenship.
What does Dilaab consider as its most public act of protest so far?
This signature campaign and this 9 o’clock prayer to the Sacred Heart for a transformed nation. Without prayer, this will become sheer activism, mere noise, and without purpose. With prayer, we are recognizing that it is God who first of all desires transformation. It is God’s agenda, actually.
But we don’t want to get ahead of God. We don’t want to be far from God’s plan. Let God lead. That’s why prayer is very important. We need to discern. We are very much involved in trying to link with other church-based groups that are doing something about graft and corruption. We need to get our act together as a Church.
In our mass in search for the truth, we will be guided by our statement. Wherever people are organized, there is politics. And politics means, by God originally, to serve the common good. So if serving the common good is politics, then I am political. But partisan politics with their agenda is something we don’t get involved with.
How are Dilaab’s responses to the controversy shaped or influence by leaders of the Catholic Church in Cebu? What role does Archbishop Ricardo Cardinal Vidal play when Dilaab plans for activities or public responses?
We have a board of advisers, many of whom are bishops. We consult with them and move in tandem with them. So we consult, give updates, and the statements of CBCP and Cardinal Vidal help us.
We are working in tandem with the church because we are church-based. We also feel the pulse of the people. In a way, we are acting as a bridge—feeling the pulse of the people and other sectors and working in tandem with, of course, Cardinal Vidal and CBCP.
How do you sustain your faith in government and political processes, when corruption allegations and scandals never seem to cease? What advice would you give taxpayers and citizens about keeping their faith in the government and politics?
My faith is in God. There has to be some level of faith, but the ultimate faith is in God. I look at out people and I still believe that there are more honest than dishonest people, only that the dishonest ones are better organized, better funded and more influential, while the greater majority who are honest are silent and apathetic. That’s the challenge.
We have an initiative in Dilaab called “Pwede pala.” Here, we are documenting and highlighting contributions of people in various sectors, especially the government, who are showing us the way towards transparent, accountable and moral leadership. We don’t want the people to fall into despair. We are convinced that there are really honest people. The problem is what makes news is the corrupt.
What’s your reading of the public’s reactions so far to the NBN-ZTE deal and Lozada’s story? Do you think that’s good or bad for the country?
If you ask me, the people are dissatisfied by two options that are being offered to them. One option is the status quo with cosmetic changes. The other one is, “Resign! Let’s change!”
We need something that is substantial, that is within the Constitution, where people can really participate, where there are substantial gains against corruption. In our statement and in the statement of Cardinal Vidal, we listed down the many high-profile cases-both local and national-that remained unresolved, like the Girl Scout scam and shabu laboratory case.
Unless these cases are resolved, there will be no whistleblowers. Put yourself in the shoes of the whistleblower. “I am risking my life but nothing seems to be happening. It’s not worth risking my life.”
I think it’s how the consciences of the people are formed after two People Power revolutions and other things. People are more discerning, more wise. They are not easily swept off by their emotions. That is why we don’t want to glorify any whistleblowers, although they need to be supported.
That’s another significance in signature campaigns. It’s really issues in small dosages. Don’t force people to sign. Make them understand the issues. It’s an opportunity for conscience formation and sharing of information. I think the tipping point will be seen in the 2010 elections but I hope even before that, the people will join Dilaab in acts of heroic Christian citizenship.
comments